UNSPSC 85653405: Repair left upper arm muscle, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to repair left upper arm muscle, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0KQ80ZZ

UNSPSC 85653405 Repair left upper arm muscle, open approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the work state and local governments are actually procuring under this taxonomy entry. The recent opportunities tagged with this code do not involve surgical repair of upper arm muscle; instead, they span comprehensive healthcare administration and management services, including inmate prison medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care platforms, peer support services for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical director oversight.

The issuing bodies are a mix of county government procurement offices and special-purpose health authorities, with primary activity in Georgia, Florida, and California. The Columbus Consolidated Government issued an RFP in April 2026 for inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison (RFP 26-0008, response due May 15, 2026); Collier County Board of County Commissioners issued an RFP for pharmacy benefit management services covering approximately 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members (RFP 25-8414, closed April 9, 2026); Monroe County Board of County Commissioners issued an RFP for virtual primary and urgent care services for approximately 2,300 county members (RFP 628, response due April 16, 2026); San Mateo County Health's Behavioral Health and Recovery Services issued an RFP for a peer support pilot program for peer workers (RFP 2025-007, response due July 2, 2025); and the Santa Monica Fire Department issued an RFP for a medical director (RFP 455, response due October 16, 2025). This code appears to carry a significant mismatch between its stated scope and actual procurement activity; vendors pursuing work under this taxonomy entry should clarify coding with the issuing jurisdiction before investing in proposal development.