UNSPSC 85653034: Supplement right lower leg muscle with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement right lower leg muscle with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0KUS4KZ

UNSPSC 85653034 Supplement right lower leg muscle with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code whose nominal surgical procedure classification does not match the recent state and local contract activity posted under it. The recent opportunities tagged to this code reflect medical services procurement — disability medical evaluations, occupational health surveillance, surgical benefit carve-outs, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and youth detention emergency care — none of which involve lower leg muscle supplementation procedures. The code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its stated surgical scope.

The issuing bodies posting under the code include a state department (Washington State Department of Transportation), county government bodies (Harris County, Collier County, Santa Clara County), and city retirement and health-benefits offices (City of Phoenix, City of Long Beach). Geographic spread covers Washington, Texas, Florida, Arizona, and California, with no clear concentration. One representative opportunity is the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP 20260825 for occupational medical surveillance services with a pre-bid conference on August 31, 2026 and proposals due October 9, 2026; another is the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP RTMRFP26001 for independent medical evaluation services, with written inquiries due September 29, 2026 and proposals due October 16, 2026 at 2:00 p.m., for a $750,000 maximum over five years. The mismatch between code name and procurement activity suggests either a data-entry error in source systems or a systematic miscoding practice; firms should verify actual procurement intent directly with issuing bodies rather than rely on the code classification alone.