UNSPSC 85652418: Excision of right neck muscle, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of right neck muscle, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0KB23ZZ

UNSPSC 85652418 Excision of right neck muscle, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope describes a specific surgical procedure, but the recent opportunities tagged under it reflect healthcare administration and staffing services unrelated to surgical intervention—disability benefit medical evaluations, centers of excellence carve-out programs for elective surgeries, occupational health surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for youth in detention, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary clinical staffing. These solicitations involve medical record review, benefit adjudication, network management, compliance oversight, and labor—not the excision procedure the code nominally describes. The issuing bodies span county health systems (Santa Clara, Collier County), city retirement boards (Phoenix), state transportation departments (Washington), county juvenile justice (Harris County), and municipal HR departments (Long Beach), with no concentration in any single jurisdiction type or state.

Recent opportunities show geographic spread across Arizona (Phoenix Retirement Office RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), California (City of Long Beach HR26753, due October 7; Santa Clara County RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7), Washington State (WSDOT WSF occupational surveillance RFP20260825, due October 9), Texas (Harris County RFI 071626BNM, due September 25), and Florida (Collier County PBM RFP 25-8414). The code shows little to no relevant recent activity for its stated commodity purpose; the mismatch between the code's medical-procedure label and the administrative and staffing services actually being solicited suggests either miscoding at point of posting or misapplication of the taxonomy to healthcare benefits and occupational health procurement.