UNSPSC 85652405: Repair head muscle, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to repair head muscle, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0KQ03ZZ

UNSPSC 85652405 Repair head muscle, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a clinical procedure classification—does not align with the healthcare and administrative services actually being solicited under it by state and local bodies. Recent opportunities tagged to this code include inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care, peer support services for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical director services—none of which constitute procedural repair of head musculature via percutaneous approach. The mismatch suggests either a data-entry error in the source records or a coding practice that does not reflect the actual work being procured.

The issuing bodies posting under this code span county and municipal health authorities and correctional systems: the Columbus Consolidated Government (Muscogee County Prison medical and pharmacy services, RFP No. 26-0008, due May 15, 2026); Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management for 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members, RFP 25-8414, due April 9, 2026); Monroe County, Florida (virtual primary and urgent care for 2,300 county members, RFP, due April 16, 2026); San Mateo County, California (Mental Health Services Act peer support pilot, $580,000 over three years, RFP 2025-007); and the Santa Monica Fire Department (emergency medical services medical director, RFP 628, due October 16, 2025). Activity clusters in Florida and California, with sporadic solicitations in Georgia and scattered elsewhere. Given the code-scope mismatch, business development professionals should treat this classification as unreliable for targeted pursuit and cross-reference opportunities against clinical and administrative health-services codes before committing resources.