UNSPSC 85642783: Drainage of scalp subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of scalp subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0J903ZZ

UNSPSC 85642783 Drainage of scalp subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code showing no meaningful recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its clinical scope. The six opportunities posted between July and September 2026 that appear tagged under this code—independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical benefit carve-outs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for state ferry workers, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—represent administrative healthcare and human services contracting across multiple jurisdictions and service lines, none of which concern drainage procedures or subcutaneous surgical intervention. The code appears to be a data-tagging anomaly rather than a genuine reflection of state and local procurement intent.

State and local buyers issuing under this tag include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and Santa Clara County Health System (California). The geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. Activity is dispersed across municipal retirement systems, city employee benefits offices, state transportation agencies, county juvenile justice systems, and county health networks—a fragmented issuing-body mix with no clear repeat buyer of the work nominally described by the code. Given this mismatch between code name and recent solicitation content, the code merits close re-examination for proper taxonomy assignment or for evidence of actual scalp drainage procedure procurement, which the current opportunity record does not support.