UNSPSC 85642405: Drainage of left lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of left lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0J9P3ZZ

UNSPSC 85642405 Drainage of left lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the work actually being solicited under it in state and local procurement. The recent opportunities posted under this code—independent medical evaluation services for public safety retirement determinations, surgery benefit carve-out programs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for state ferry workers, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing for a county health system—involve contracting for healthcare administration, staffing coordination, and benefit program management, not surgical drainage procedures. The code taxonomy appears misaligned with current state and local purchasing activity, and no meaningful commodity-level procurement exists under the drainage procedure classification itself.

The issuing bodies soliciting under the code span multiple jurisdictions and governance structures: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (special-purpose pension board), the City of Long Beach, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and the County of Santa Clara Health System. Recent opportunities cluster in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, reflecting geographically dispersed state and local healthcare administration and staffing procurement rather than a concentrated market. The code's assignment to these opportunities signals a taxonomic mislabeling in state and local procurement systems rather than active market demand for the procedure itself.