UNSPSC 85642186: Supplement of right lower arm subcutaneous tissue and fascia with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement of right lower arm subcutaneous tissue and fascia with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0JUG37Z

UNSPSC 85642186, Supplement of right lower arm subcutaneous tissue and fascia with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach, is a Commodity code with minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its clinical scope. The recent opportunities posted under this code do not reflect orthopaedic tissue grafting or surgical procedures; instead, they span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical carve-out benefit programs, and emergency medical services for youth in custody—none of which directly address lower-extremity soft-tissue supplementation or autologous grafting. The code shows a significant mismatch between its UNSPSC classification and what state and local bodies are actually soliciting in practice.

The geographic spread of recent postings spans Washington State (occupational medical surveillance through the Washington State Department of Transportation), Arizona (independent medical evaluation services through the City of Phoenix), California (surgical benefit programs through the City of Long Beach and temporary staffing through Santa Clara County Health System), Florida (pharmacy benefit management through Collier County), and Texas (emergency medical services through Harris County), suggesting opportunistic tagging rather than systematic demand under this Commodity code. No issuing body appears more than once. Given the evident mismatch between the code's clinical specification and the actual work being solicited, this code does not present a viable business development focus for firms pursuing state and local contracts in surgical or orthopaedic tissue services.