UNSPSC 85641811: Replacement of right lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of right lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0JRN0JZ

UNSPSC 85641811 Replacement of right lower leg subcutaneous tissue and fascia with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific surgical procedure for orthopedic reconstruction, yet the six recent opportunities posted under this code taxonomy span disability medical record summarization, surgical benefit carve-out programs for health plans, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve orthopedic prosthetic or tissue-replacement surgery. The issuing bodies include a city retirement office (Phoenix), a city employee benefits program (Long Beach), a state transportation department (Washington), a county juvenile probation department (Harris County), a county human resources division (Collier County), and a regional health system (Santa Clara County).

The geographic spread of recent postings spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no clear concentration. The sole solicitation touching surgery directly is the City of Long Beach RFP for a surgical benefit carve-out program (HR26753, due October 7, 2026), which seeks a Center of Excellence network operator to manage knee, hip, orthopedic, shoulder, spine, heart, weight loss, and oncology procedures — a benefit administration and care coordination service, not the clinical delivery or prosthetic supply work implied by the code itself. The code shows little relevant recent activity for vendors providing surgical implants, prosthetic devices, or surgical procedure services; the mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual procurement activity in the record suggests either miscoding by issuing bodies or that this Commodity code does not reflect current state and local contracting patterns.