UNSPSC 85641460: Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0JPT3KZ

UNSPSC 85641460 Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that in recent state and local procurement shows little activity aligned with its nominal surgical-procedure scope. The recent opportunities tagged under this code reflect a significant mismatch: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office is soliciting independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations; the City of Long Beach is requesting a surgical carve-out and Centers of Excellence network for employees and retirees; the Washington State Department of Transportation is procuring occupational medical surveillance services; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department is issuing an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth; Collier County is seeking pharmacy benefit management; and the County of Santa Clara Health System is establishing a vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories. These opportunities span medical administration, employee benefits program management, occupational health oversight, detention healthcare, pharmacy services, and temporary clinical staffing—none of which directly involve removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from trunk tissue. The issuing bodies span state departments, county governments, cities, and health systems; no single buyer appears more than once in the recent block.

The code shows activity across multiple states and regions—Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida in the recent record—but the opportunities are fundamentally misclassified under this Commodity code and do not reflect a coherent procurement category. State and local buyers tagging opportunities to this code appear to be using it as a catch-all or administrative default for medical services rather than specifically for tissue-substitute removal procedures. A business development professional evaluating whether to pursue work under this code should recognize that the nominal scope and actual posted opportunities diverge substantially. The code does not support a reliable signal of genuine demand for the surgical procedure it names.