UNSPSC 85641404: Transfer abdomen subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to transfer abdomen subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0JX83ZZ

UNSPSC 85641404 Transfer abdomen subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it show no alignment with this clinical service line. The five opportunities posted between February and April 2026 span inmate medical and pharmacy services management, pharmacy benefit administration, virtual primary and urgent care delivery, peer support services for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction — none of which involve the surgical transfer of abdominal tissue or fascia. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual work being solicited suggests this code carries little relevant procurement activity for firms pursuing state and local healthcare contracts.

The sourced opportunities originate from a mix of issuing bodies — county governments (Muscogee County, Georgia; Collier County, Florida; Monroe County, Florida), a county health agency (San Mateo County, California), and a municipal fire department (Santa Monica, California) — but none of the opportunities describe or require the surgical procedure named in the UNSPSC code itself. Recent activity is concentrated in Florida and California, with Georgia and California also represented, and covers administrative healthcare services, managed care platforms, and workforce support rather than surgical or procedural services. No evidence in the source supports active procurement demand for transfer of abdominal subcutaneous tissue and fascia services under this code at the state or local level; the code appears to be a taxonomy mislabeling issue rather than an active procurement category.