UNSPSC 85641005: Revision of tissue expander in trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, external approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of tissue expander in trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, external approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0JWTXNZ

UNSPSC 85641005 Revision of tissue expander in trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, external approach is a Commodity code with minimal recent state and local procurement relevance. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure for tissue expansion—does not align with the recent solicitation activity posted under this code, which instead reflects healthcare administrative and staffing services unrelated to orthopedic or reconstructive surgical procedures.

Recent state and local opportunities tagged to this code include independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, RFP due October 16, 2026); surgical benefit carve-out program administration for employee health plans (City of Long Beach, RFP due October 7, 2026); occupational medical surveillance for ferry system employees (Washington State Department of Transportation, RFP due October 9, 2026); emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, RFI due September 25, 2026); pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners, RFP due April 9, 2026); and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories (County of Santa Clara Health System, RFP due October 7, 2026). The issuing bodies span state departments, county governments, and cities. The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The code shows no recent activity for tissue expander revision procedures or related reconstructive surgery contracting; the mismatch between the code's clinical scope and the actual procurement activity posted suggests either miscoding or that state and local surgical procedure codes are tagged inconsistently across jurisdictions.