UNSPSC 85631348: Replacement of right upper leg skin with autologous tissue substitute, full thickness, external approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of right upper leg skin with autologous tissue substitute, full thickness, external approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0HRHX73

UNSPSC 85631348 Replacement of right upper leg skin with autologous tissue substitute, full thickness, external approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with actual state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure — autologous skin grafting on the upper leg — yet the recent opportunities tagged under it reflect a sharp mismatch: they solicit independent medical evaluation services, occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-outs for Centers of Excellence networks, and emergency medical services for youth in custody. None of these solicitations involve the performance of the graft procedure itself. The code's nominal scope does not map to the work state and local governments are actually buying under this classification.

The issuing bodies span a diverse cross-section of state and local government — municipal retirement offices (City of Phoenix), cities (City of Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county human resources and health consortiums (Collier County, County of Santa Clara) — but their actual procurements target administrative health services, vendor networks, staffing pools, and medical record management rather than surgical procedures. Geographic activity appears in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, though the code's classification scheme suggests deeper dysfunction than geographic concentration. Because the recent opportunities under this code address health system administration, benefits management, and occupational medicine rather than surgical tissue replacement, this code represents a tagging anomaly rather than a viable procurement segment for surgical service providers.