UNSPSC 85621370: Drainage of coccygeal glomus with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of coccygeal glomus with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0G9B40Z

UNSPSC 85621370 Drainage of coccygeal glomus with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code's nominal scope—a highly specific surgical procedure—does not align with the recent state and local solicitations tagged under it. The six most recent opportunities solicited by state and local bodies under this code cover independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), surgical benefit carve-out programs for employee health plans (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (Washington State Department of Transportation), emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories (County of Santa Clara Health System). None of these solicitations involve coccygeal glomus drainage or percutaneous endoscopic procedures, suggesting the code assignment reflects a data-tagging error rather than active procurement demand in this category.

The issuing bodies span multiple governance tiers—state departments, county health systems and human resources divisions, city retirement offices, and transit authorities—across Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas. The range and diversity of these opportunities indicate the code is being used as a catch-all for health services and medical administration rather than as a precise commodity classifier. Firms pursuing work under this code should verify the actual scope of individual solicitations rather than rely on the code name alone, as the mismatch suggests procurement offices may be applying incorrect taxonomy. No clear repeat buyers or geographic concentration emerges from the recent activity.