UNSPSC 85621275: Destruction of bilateral carotid bodies, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to destruction of bilateral carotid bodies, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0G583ZZ

UNSPSC 85621275 Destruction of bilateral carotid bodies, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure for carotid body destruction—does not match the medical, administrative, and occupational health services actually being solicited by state and local jurisdictions under this classification.

The recent opportunities tagged to this code reflect administrative and clinical support services rather than the procedural intervention the code describes. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026) solicited independent medical evaluation services including disability medical record summarization and scheduling of examinations for approximately 75 annual public safety pension disability claims, with a five-year contract ceiling of $750,000. The Washington State Department of Transportation, on behalf of the Washington State Ferries, requested occupational medical surveillance services across 14 ferry locations statewide (RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), comprising baseline and periodic medical examinations for four personnel categories supervised by occupational-medicine-board-certified physicians. The County of Santa Clara Health System established a non-exclusive vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across 13 ancillary clinical specialties (RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026), explicitly excluding nursing and physician placement. Geographic activity spans Arizona, Washington State, California, and other scattered jurisdictions, with no clear concentration pattern. The mismatch between the code's procedural specificity and the administrative and occupational health services actually being bought suggests the code receives little relevant procurement volume in the state and local market.