UNSPSC 85621259: Drainage of bilateral carotid bodies with drainage device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of bilateral carotid bodies with drainage device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0G9830Z

UNSPSC 85621259 Drainage of bilateral carotid bodies with drainage device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal medical-procedure scope. The six recent opportunities tagged under this code—independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—represent health services administration, benefits management, and clinical staffing rather than the specific procedural intervention the code describes. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by issuing bodies or that this Commodity code is not actively used to classify state and local health procurements in practice.

The issuing bodies across these opportunities span multiple sectors: city pension boards and retirement offices (City of Phoenix), municipal employee-benefit administrators (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile detention systems (Harris County), county government health consortia (Collier County), and county health systems (Santa Clara County). None of these opportunities solicit the drainage procedure or related medical devices; instead, they acquire administrative, staffing, and service-delivery capabilities in occupational health, retirement-benefits administration, and managed care. Without evidence of active procurement aligned to the code's nominal scope across recent state and local solicitations, the code does not present a clear business development opportunity in the state and local market.