UNSPSC 85613209: Revision of autologous tissue substitute in pancreatic duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of autologous tissue substitute in pancreatic duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FWD47Z

UNSPSC 85613209, Revision of autologous tissue substitute in pancreatic duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach, is a Commodity code that shows no recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its clinical scope. The six recent opportunities tagged under this code—including independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out networks, occupational medical surveillance, youth detention healthcare services, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—address public-sector healthcare administration, benefits management, and staffing rather than pancreatic tissue revision procedures. The mismatch between the code's nominal description and the actual work being solicited reflects either erroneous code assignment by issuing bodies or a disconnect between UNSPSC taxonomy and operational procurement practices in state and local health systems.

The geographic distribution spans Arizona (City of Phoenix), California (City of Long Beach and County of Santa Clara), Florida (Collier County), Texas (Harris County), and Washington (Washington State Department of Transportation), with no identifiable concentration. Recent issuing bodies include municipal pension boards, cities, counties, state transportation authorities, and county health systems. Because none of these opportunities involve the clinical procedure named in the code, readers pursuing this UNSPSC code should treat it as dormant for state and local procurement purposes and verify with issuing bodies whether the code assignment reflects genuine procurement intent or administrative data-quality issues.