UNSPSC 85612934: Replacement of accessory pancreatic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of accessory pancreatic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FRF0KZ

UNSPSC 85612934 Replacement of accessory pancreatic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope describes a specific surgical procedure, but recent opportunities tagged to this code involve independent medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, youth detention medical services, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which directly address pancreatic duct replacement or the surgical procedure the code names. The mismatch between the code's clinical designation and the work actually being solicited suggests either classification error in the state and local systems using this code, or the code is being applied to administrative healthcare-management functions rather than the procedural service it nominally describes.

The issuing bodies in the recent opportunities block span diverse state and local healthcare purchasers: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability medical evaluations), the City of Long Beach (employee health benefits), the Washington State Department of Transportation on behalf of Washington State Ferries (occupational health), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (youth detention medical care), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary clinical staffing). Activity appears concentrated in California, Arizona, Washington, and Texas, with no discernible geographic clustering. The code does not support a reliable decision to pursue or pass — the recent record suggests this UNSPSC designation either misclassifies the work state and local bodies are actually buying, or sees minimal volume in its true scope.