UNSPSC 85612701: Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FWB4KZ

UNSPSC 85612701 Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows no meaningful state and local procurement activity aligned with its medical procedure title. The six recent opportunities posted under this code — spanning independent medical evaluation services, surgery benefit carve-outs, occupational medical surveillance, juvenile detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — are all health administration, benefits management, or clinical staffing services with no connection to tissue substitute revision or hepatobiliary duct procedures. The code appears to be a miscategorization of administrative health services rather than a genuine procurement vehicle for the surgical intervention it nominally describes. State and local issuing bodies are applying this Commodity code incorrectly or as a catch-all for general health services, which renders the code's abstract scope unreliable as a guide to actual buying patterns.

The recent activity spans diverse issuing bodies — the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (pension board medical evaluations), the City of Long Beach (employee surgery benefits), the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational health surveillance), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (youth detention medical services), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary clinical staffing) — across Arizona, California, Washington, and Texas. No single jurisdiction appears more than once, and the opportunities represent administrative health contracting rather than procedural or surgical services. The mismatch between the code's clinical specificity and the breadth of health administration activity posted under it suggests the code is not reliably used by state and local procurement offices for its stated purpose. Firms pursuing this code should flag the categorization inconsistency with state and local procurement teams before investing in bid preparation.