UNSPSC 85612679: Bypass right hepatic duct to left hepatic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right hepatic duct to left hepatic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0F154D6

UNSPSC 85612679 Bypass right hepatic duct to left hepatic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the recent state and local procurement activity tagged to it. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the recent solicitations posted under this code span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent disability medical evaluations, surgical procedure carve-out benefits, and emergency medical services for youth in custody—none of which involve hepatic duct bypass procedures or interventional gastroenterology services. This mismatch suggests either a systematic miscoding issue in the source data or a jurisdictional use of UNSPSC taxonomy that diverges significantly from the code's clinical intent. State and local procurement activity does not support meaningful work pursuit under this code's nominal scope.

No recent state and local opportunities present procurements for hepatic duct bypass procedures, endoscopic interventions, or related medical devices or supplies aligned with the Commodity code's stated definition. The issuing bodies posting under this code—the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach, Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and Santa Clara County Health System—are buying general health services administration, medical evaluation, staffing, and benefit program management rather than specialized surgical procedures or supplies. The geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida, but geography is not decision-relevant given the fundamental mismatch between coded scope and actual procurement activity. Business development professionals should treat this code as inactive for substantive opportunity pursuit and investigate whether their target jurisdictions use alternative codes for clinical or medical device procurement.