UNSPSC 85612540: Revision of synthetic substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FWB3JZ

UNSPSC 85612540 Revision of synthetic substitute in hepatobiliary duct, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its medical procedure scope. The six opportunities posted between July and September 2026 and tagged under this code span independent medical evaluations for disability pension determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve hepatobiliary duct revision or synthetic substitute placement. The code appears to have been misapplied to general health services contracting rather than the specific surgical intervention it names. State and local procurement activity under this code, as currently labeled, does not support meaningful business development targeting.

The issuing bodies in the recent opportunities include a city retirement office (Phoenix), two cities' health benefit programs (Long Beach and Santa Clara County Health System), a state transportation department (Washington), a county juvenile justice agency (Harris County), and a county benefits consortium (Collier County). Without opportunities genuinely aligned to hepatobiliary duct revision procedures, geographic spread and representative solicitations cannot be meaningfully characterized against the code's stated scope. Firms pursuing medical procedure contracts should verify UNSPSC classification independently before responding, as the tagging mismatch here reflects broader state and local taxonomy challenges rather than a live market for the specific service.