UNSPSC 85612519: Occlusion of left hepatic duct with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of left hepatic duct with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FL63CZ

UNSPSC 85612519 Occlusion of left hepatic duct with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific medical procedure (hepatic duct occlusion), yet the recent opportunities tagged under it span independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve the named medical device or procedure. State and local procurement offices appear to have applied this code inconsistently or in error across several health services solicitations that bear no relationship to hepatic interventions. The mismatch suggests either a data-tagging anomaly or a fundamental misalignment between the code's procedural scope and the actual work being solicited under its label in the market today.

No substantive procurement activity directly related to occlusion devices or the named procedure appears in the recent opportunities block. Buyers across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington are soliciting health services administration, staffing, and benefit management — not implantable medical devices or interventional procedures. Business development professionals evaluating this Commodity code should treat it as dormant for state and local procurement purposes and seek clarification on whether the code remains active or whether recent taggers have misapplied it to unrelated health services contracts.