UNSPSC 85611736: Dilation of cystic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of cystic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0F783DZ

UNSPSC 85611736 Dilation of cystic duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach (Commodity) shows a disconnect between its nominal coding and the actual state and local contracting activity indexed under it. The recent solicitations tagged to this code instead reflect a mix of occupational health surveillance, pension-board disability medical evaluations, surgical procedure management, pharmacy benefit administration, temporary health professional staffing, and youth detention medical services—none of which involve cystic duct dilation procedures or interventional gastroenterology. The code appears to capture broad state and local healthcare administration and employee health benefit contracting rather than a specific clinical procedure.

State and local procurement bodies tagging opportunities under this code include city retirement offices (Phoenix), municipal benefits divisions (Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile probation departments (Harris County), county human resources and health systems (Collier County, Santa Clara County), and regional public health systems. Recent activity spans Arizona (medical record summary and disability evaluation for public safety pensions, due October 16, 2026), California (surgical benefit carve-out for municipal employees, due October 7, 2026), Washington (occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers across 14 locations, due October 9, 2026), and Florida (pharmacy benefit management for county employees and retirees, due April 9, 2026). The code shows little relevant recent activity relative to its stated scope; the issuing bodies and work types suggest the category may be misaligned with actual procurement taxonomy in use or that the code is being used as a catch-all for employee health benefit administration rather than for clinical procedures.