UNSPSC 85611727: Extirpation of matter from cystic duct, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to extirpation of matter from cystic duct, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FC83ZZ

UNSPSC 85611727 Extirpation of matter from cystic duct, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no coherent recent procurement activity aligned with its nominal clinical scope. The recent state and local opportunities posted under this code span independent medical evaluations for public safety pension disability determinations, surgical benefits carve-outs for government employee health plans, occupational medical surveillance for state ferry workers, specialty medical services for youth in detention, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve cystic duct procedures or related surgical intervention. The code appears to be a misclassification artifact in state and local procurement systems rather than a category under which governments are actively soliciting related services.

The opportunities in the source originate from diverse issuing bodies — municipal pension boards (City of Phoenix), city health benefits offices (City of Long Beach), a state transportation department (Washington State Department of Transportation), a county juvenile probation department (Harris County), a county health consortium (Collier County), and a county health system (County of Santa Clara) — across Arizona, California, Washington, Florida, Texas, and California respectively. The volume and geographic spread suggest that when this code is used, it reflects administrative or data-entry mismatches rather than intentional procurement under the stated commodity definition. A business development professional evaluating this code should treat it as a signal to verify actual scope with issuing bodies during Q&A rather than assume alignment between the UNSPSC taxonomy and the work being contracted.