UNSPSC 85611708: Supplement cystic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement cystic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0FU83KZ

UNSPSC 85611708 Supplement cystic duct with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code whose title suggests a specific surgical procedure, but recent state and local opportunities tagged under it bear no relationship to that scope—instead, they describe occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, disability medical evaluations, health plan surgery networks, and temporary clinical staffing. The code shows a fundamental mismatch between its nominal taxonomy label and the work actually being solicited by state and local buyers; no recent opportunities reflect the cystic duct procedure the code names.

The few opportunities posted under this code since mid-August 2026 span diverse issuing bodies and geographies: the Washington State Department of Transportation (on behalf of Washington State Ferries), the County of Santa Clara Health System in California, Collier County (Florida), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), the City of Long Beach (California), and the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona). The work ranges from baseline occupational medical examinations across 14 Washington ferry terminals due October 9, 2026 (IFB RFP20260825), to a five-year pharmacy benefit management contract covering 2,400 county employees in Florida (RFP 25-8414), to a non-exclusive temporary health professional staffing vehicle for Santa Clara's health system with no guaranteed volume (RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052 due October 7, 2026). This code does not reflect organized procurement activity around its stated procedure; it appears to be a taxonomy mislabeling issue rather than an active procurement category worth pursuing.