UNSPSC 85603866: Dilation of anus with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of anus with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0D7Q4DZ

UNSPSC 85603866 Dilation of anus with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code whose nominal scope does not align with recent state and local procurement activity tagged under it. The code describes a specific medical procedure, yet the opportunities posted under this code solicit comprehensive healthcare services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual care platforms, peer support programs, and medical directorship roles — none of which involve the procedural intervention named in the code. State and local governments appear to be using this code as a catch-all tag for healthcare procurement that does not fit the code's actual definition.

The recent opportunities span Florida, Georgia, and California and represent diverse issuing bodies: the Columbus Consolidated Government's Finance Department Purchasing Division (Muscogee County Prison inmate medical and pharmacy services, RFP 26-0008, due May 15, 2026), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management services for 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members, RFP 25-8414, due April 9, 2026), Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (virtual primary and urgent care services for approximately 2,300 county members, RFP, due April 16, 2026), San Mateo County Health Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (peer support pilot program for peer workers, RFP 2025-007, due July 2, 2025), and the Santa Monica Fire Department (medical director services, RFP 455, due October 16, 2025). This code shows little relevant recent activity for the procedure it nominally describes; the mismatch between code assignment and actual procurement scope suggests misclassification at the point of posting rather than genuine market demand under the Commodity code as named.