UNSPSC 85603446: Dilation of rectum via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of rectum via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0D7P8DZ

UNSPSC 85603446 Dilation of rectum via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic, is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with actual state and local procurement activity. The code is a clinical procedural descriptor from a medical device and services taxonomy; however, state and local governments do not routinely solicit for this specific procedure or device category in the open-market opportunities tracked in recent procurement records.

The recent opportunities tagged under this code reflect health services procurement unrelated to the procedural scope: the City of Phoenix is soliciting independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations under its public safety pension system; the City of Long Beach is requesting proposals for a surgical procedure carve-out and Center of Excellence network for employee health plans; the Washington State Department of Transportation is requesting occupational medical surveillance services for ferry system employees; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department is issuing an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth; Collier County is issuing an RFP for pharmacy benefit management services; and the County of Santa Clara Health System is establishing a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories. No issuing body has solicited for rectum dilation devices or procedures under this code. The divergence between the code's technical clinical definition and the actual procurement work suggests either a cataloging error or a system in which the code is rarely used by state and local procurement offices for genuine market activity in this commodity.