UNSPSC 85601710: Occlusion of transverse colon via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of transverse colon via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DLL8DZ

UNSPSC 85601710 Occlusion of transverse colon via natural or artificial opening intraluminal device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code describing a specific surgical procedure, but the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it reflect no direct procurement activity for that clinical intervention. Instead, the opportunities posted under this code span occupational medical examinations, disability benefit evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, surgical center-of-excellence carve-out programs, temporary health professional staffing, and general hospital services for detained youth—none of which align with colon-occlusion procedures. This systematic mismatch between the nominal code scope and the actual work being solicited suggests either a data-tagging error in the underlying opportunity records or that state and local procurement systems are applying this Commodity code to broader health services categories rather than discrete procedural interventions.

The issuing bodies across these opportunities include a city retirement office (Phoenix), two municipal governments (Long Beach and Seattle area), a county juvenile justice department (Harris County), a county health consortium (Collier County), and a county health system (Santa Clara). The geographic concentration spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no single jurisdiction appearing more than once in the recent-activity block. Given the absence of opportunities directly aligned with the code's clinical definition, this code appears unsuitable for procurement targeting and warrants clarification with the issuing state or local procurement office before allocating business development resources.