UNSPSC 85601563: Bypass cecum to cecum with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass cecum to cecum with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0D1H4KH

UNSPSC 85601563 Bypass cecum to cecum with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code whose title describes a surgical procedure, yet recent state and local opportunities tagged to this code show no direct procurement of that service. Instead, the issuing bodies are soliciting medical evaluation, health plan administration, occupational surveillance, and staffing services — activities unrelated to the procedure named in the code. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office is requesting independent medical evaluation services for disability determinations; the City of Long Beach is procuring surgical procedure carve-out benefits management; the Washington State Department of Transportation is contracting occupational medical surveillance; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department is seeking emergency and specialty medical care providers; Collier County is soliciting pharmacy benefit management; and the County of Santa Clara Health System is establishing a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing. This substantial mismatch between the code's procedural scope and the work actually being bought suggests the code sees little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement, or these opportunities have been miscoded.

The limited geographic spread visible in recent activity spans Arizona, California (Long Beach and Santa Clara), Washington State, Texas (Harris County), and Florida (Collier County), with no clear concentration in any single state or jurisdiction. The issuing bodies represent a broad cross-section — state departments, county governments, city procurement offices, and health systems — but the diversity of service lines (medical evaluation, benefits administration, surveillance, staffing) rather than the uniformity of procurement activity under this code suggests these opportunities were tagged incorrectly or the code's definition does not align with how state and local buyers are using it. Without a clear pattern of state and local governments procuring the procedure itself or closely related services, this code does not present a focused market signal for business development purposes.