UNSPSC 85601154: Bypass cecum to rectum via natural or artificial opening autologous tissue substitute, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass cecum to rectum via natural or artificial opening autologous tissue substitute, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0D1H87P

UNSPSC 85601154 Bypass cecum to rectum via natural or artificial opening autologous tissue substitute, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with state and local government procurement activity. The recent opportunities tagged to this code involve independent medical evaluation services, occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, surgical care carve-out programs, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for youth in custody — none of which relate to gastrointestinal surgical procedures or tissue-substitute implants. The code appears to describe a specific clinical procedure or implant product, whereas the tagged solicitations address health service administration, clinical staffing, and benefits management at the organizational level.

No recent state and local contract opportunities directly match the scope described by this UNSPSC code. The six opportunities present in the source involve the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (independent medical evaluations for disability determinations), the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance), the City of Long Beach (surgical care networks), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency and specialty services for detained youth), Collier County (pharmacy benefit management), and Santa Clara County Health System (temporary ancillary clinical staffing). This pattern suggests the code may be misapplied to these opportunities in procurement systems, or the code itself carries minimal relevance to state and local contract activity as currently structured.