UNSPSC 85594310: Revision of autologous tissue substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of autologous tissue substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DW047Z

UNSPSC 85594310 Revision of autologous tissue substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach, a Commodity code, shows a fundamental mismatch between its nominal medical procedure scope and the state and local opportunities recently tagged under it. The recent solicitations fall instead into occupational health surveillance, pension disability medical evaluations, specialty surgical benefit administration, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, youth detention healthcare, and emergency medical services — none of which involve autologous tissue revision or percutaneous endoscopic procedures. The code records little relevant recent activity aligned with its stated taxonomy.

The six posted opportunities span issuing bodies including state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county government (Collier County, Harris County, Santa Clara County), city retirement and benefits administration (City of Phoenix, City of Long Beach), and special-purpose districts (Washington State Ferries). Geographic activity clusters in California, Arizona, Florida, Texas, and Washington; the Washington State Department of Transportation's occupational medical surveillance RFP for Washington State Ferries (RFP 20260825, due October 9, 2026) and the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's independent medical evaluation RFP (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026) represent the largest recent awards visible in the block. The code's miscoding against its actual procurement activity suggests administrative tagging error rather than active market demand; business development professionals should verify code alignment directly with issuing bodies before pursuing work classified under this code.