UNSPSC 85594307: Revision of synthetic substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DW04JZ

UNSPSC 85594307 Revision of synthetic substitute in upper intestinal tract, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code showing minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code title describes a specific gastrointestinal surgical procedure, but recent opportunities posted under this code span occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, pension board disability medical evaluations, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-outs, and juvenile detention healthcare—none of which involve endoscopic revision of synthetic intestinal substitutes. State and local procurement offices appear to have applied this code inconsistently or incorrectly to health services contracts that do not match the procedural scope the code nominally describes.

The recent opportunities span diverse issuing bodies: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability medical record summary and independent medical evaluations), the City of Long Beach (surgical benefit program administration), the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary health professional staffing pool). Activity is concentrated in California, Arizona, Florida, and Washington, with no two solicitations addressing the same service line. The lack of cohesion across recent postings under this code suggests either systematic miscoding or that the code itself is being used as a catch-all for healthcare administration and staffing services unrelated to procedural interventions. Firms pursuing work in occupational health, pharmacy benefits, or medical staffing should not rely on this code to identify relevant opportunities and should search instead by specific service category or issuing body.