UNSPSC 85594228: Excision of duodenum, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of duodenum, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DB93ZZ

UNSPSC 85594228 Excision of duodenum, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that represents a specific surgical procedure. The recent state and local opportunities tagged with this code show minimal alignment with its nominal scope; the opportunities are not soliciting surgical services but rather institutional healthcare administration, pharmacy benefit management, virtual care platforms, peer support services, and medical director positions. The code appears to be a mislabeling artifact in the state and local procurement database rather than a meaningful category for business development purposes under this code.

The issuing bodies in the recent opportunities block span county health systems, county government purchasing on behalf of employee health plans, county jail medical services, and municipal fire departments—a broad mix of healthcare service purchasers. Representative opportunities include the Columbus Consolidated Government (Muscogee County Prison) issuing RFP No. 26-0008 for inmate medical and pharmacy services (due May 15, 2026), Collier County issuing RFP 25-8414 for pharmacy benefit management services (due April 9, 2026), Monroe County issuing an RFP for virtual primary and urgent care services (due April 16, 2026), San Mateo County issuing an RFP for peer support services ($580,000 total funding), and the Santa Monica Fire Department issuing an RFP for a medical director (due October 16, 2025). Geographic activity spans Florida (Collier and Monroe Counties), Georgia (Muscogee County), California (San Mateo County and Santa Monica), and represents scattered state and local healthcare procurement. The code itself lacks coherent recent activity—the surgical-procedure designation does not match what state and local procurement offices are actually buying under it, suggesting vendors should verify code accuracy with issuing bodies before pursuing opportunities tagged to this classification.