UNSPSC 85593509: Removal of stimulator lead from anal sphincter, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of stimulator lead from anal sphincter, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DPR4MZ

UNSPSC 85593509 Removal of stimulator lead from anal sphincter, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure for implanted medical device removal—does not align with the state and local opportunities posted under this classification.

The recent solicitations tagged to this code instead reflect broad healthcare service procurement across multiple jurisdictions: the City of Phoenix is seeking independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations; the City of Long Beach is requesting surgical procedure carve-out and Center of Excellence network management for employee health plans; the Washington State Department of Transportation is procuring occupational medical surveillance services for ferry system personnel; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department is issuing an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth; Collier County is seeking pharmacy benefit management administration; and the County of Santa Clara Health System is establishing a vendor pool for temporary ancillary clinical staffing. These opportunities span independent medical evaluations, occupational health examinations, employee health plan administration, youth detention healthcare, pharmacy claims processing, and temporary clinical staffing—none of which involves the specific procedure named in the code. The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington, Florida, and Texas. The mismatch between the code's clinical specificity and the actual procurement activity suggests either misclassification in state and local systems or that this code is not the appropriate vehicle for healthcare services contracting in this market segment.