UNSPSC 85593246: Removal of intraluminal device from stomach, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of intraluminal device from stomach, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0DP63DZ

UNSPSC 85593246 Removal of intraluminal device from stomach, percutaneous approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under this code. The recent opportunities posted to state and local procurement platforms under this UNSPSC number do not involve intraluminal device removal or stomach procedures. Instead, the opportunities tagged to this code cover independent medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, occupational health surveillance, surgical center-of-excellence carve-outs, youth detention healthcare, and temporary ancillary health professional staffing—none of which align with the procedural scope the code nominally describes. This classification mismatch suggests the code may be incorrectly assigned to these opportunities by the posting jurisdictions, or the code's application in state and local procurement databases does not track discrete clinical procedures.

The six recent opportunities span Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, issued by a city retirement office, two municipal human resources departments, a state transportation agency, a county juvenile probation authority, and a county health system. Without opportunities that actually address intraluminal device removal or gastric procedures, the code does not present a meaningful procurement signal for firms in that clinical specialty or device sector. Practitioners should verify code assignments directly with issuing jurisdictions when evaluating state and local opportunities in specialized medical device or surgical procedure categories, as taxonomy mapping in public procurement databases may not consistently align with clinical specificity at the commodity tier.