UNSPSC 85592000: Esophogastric junction stomach mesentery, percutaneous approach

This class includes one or more of 25 standard surgical interventions or procedures on component parts of the structures of the esophogastric junction and stomach and mesentery with percutaneous approach. These surgical interventions or procedures are listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 PCS under code 0D.

UNSPSC 85592000 Esophagogastric junction stomach mesentery, percutaneous approach is a Class code that does not reflect the state and local procurement activity actually posted under it. The six recent opportunities tagged to this code span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, disability medical evaluations, surgical benefit carve-outs, and youth detention healthcare — none of which involve esophagogastric or percutaneous gastric procedures. The mismatch suggests either a systematic miscoding error in the source data or a data-integrity issue that renders this code unsuitable for business development targeting based on recent solicitation activity.

The opportunities that do appear under the code involve state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county health systems and administrative bodies (Santa Clara Health System, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners), cities (Phoenix, Long Beach), and regional authorities. Recent RFPs and RFQs include Phoenix's disability medical record summary and independent medical evaluation services (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026, $750,000 maximum over five years), Long Beach's surgical benefit carve-out program (RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026), and Santa Clara's temporary health professional staffing qualification pool (RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026, non-exclusive, no guaranteed volume). Activity spans Arizona, California, Washington, Florida, and Texas. Because the code's nominal scope bears no meaningful relationship to the actual solicitations posted, business development professionals should treat this code as a data anomaly rather than a procurement signal.