UNSPSC 85583725: Release epiglottis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to release epiglottis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0CNR8ZZ

UNSPSC 85583725 Release epiglottis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic (Commodity) shows minimal alignment between its narrow medical procedure code designation and the state and local procurement activity tagged under it. The recent opportunities in the data reflect institutional healthcare administration and vendor services — inmate medical programs, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary care platforms, peer support networks, and medical director oversight — none of which involve the specific endoscopic procedure the code nominally describes. State and local governments do procure healthcare services broadly, but the solicitations here are for comprehensive care delivery, administrative programs, and staffing rather than procedure-specific medical devices or interventions.

The issuing bodies span county governments (Muscogee County, Georgia; Collier County, Florida; Monroe County, Florida) and a county health department (San Mateo County, California), with one municipal fire department (Santa Monica). Representative recent opportunities include the Columbus Consolidated Government's RFP for inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison (due May 15, 2026), Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members with historical spending near $8.7 million annually (due April 9, 2026), Monroe County's RFP for virtual primary and urgent care services for 2,300 county members (due April 16, 2026), and San Mateo County's RFP for peer support services for peer workers funded at $580,000 over three years. The code shows recent activity concentrated in Florida and California with secondary Georgia representation, but the substantive mismatch between the commodity code's specific procedural scope and the institutional healthcare procurement activity tagged under it suggests either miscoding by issuing bodies or that the code does not represent a material category for state and local competitive solicitation.