UNSPSC 85572617: Fragmentation in lingula bronchus, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to fragmentation in lingula bronchus, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0BF94ZZ

UNSPSC 85572617 Fragmentation in lingula bronchus, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows no alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the recent opportunities posted under this code involve inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director services—none of which involve the procedural intervention the code purports to classify. The mismatch indicates this code is either incorrectly tagged by issuing bodies or serves as a catch-all placeholder for health services procurement that does not fit the code's intended scope.

The geographic spread of tagged opportunities spans Florida (Collier County and Monroe County), Georgia (Muscogee County), California (San Mateo County), and California again (Santa Monica), with issuing bodies including county procurement offices, county health and human services departments, and municipal fire departments. The most recent opportunities include Columbus Consolidated Government's RFP No. 26-0008 for inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison (due May 15, 2026), Collier County Board of County Commissioners' RFP 25-8414 for pharmacy benefit management services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members (due April 9, 2026), and Monroe County Board of County Commissioners' virtual primary and urgent care services RFP (due April 16, 2026). Because the code itself does not reflect the actual scope of work being solicited, firms should not rely on this code to identify genuine procurement opportunities in health services contracting—the tagging error renders the code unreliable as a market signal.