UNSPSC 85572412: Revision of extraluminal device in tracheobronchial tree, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of extraluminal device in tracheobronchial tree, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0BW04CZ

UNSPSC 85572412 Revision of extraluminal device in tracheobronchial tree, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code whose nominal scope does not align with recent state and local procurement activity posted under this code. The recent opportunities tagged to this code solicit medical surveillance, occupational health examinations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, independent disability medical evaluations, and surgical benefit carve-outs — none of which involve tracheobronchial device revision or endoscopic procedures. The code shows no relevant recent activity tied to its stated clinical scope.

The code generates solicitation activity across multiple issuing-body types, including city retirement offices (City of Phoenix), county government (Collier County, Harris County, Santa Clara County), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and municipal health systems (City of Long Beach). Representative recent opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office RFP for independent medical evaluation services due October 16, 2026, at $750,000 over five years; the Washington State Department of Transportation RFP for occupational medical surveillance services due October 9, 2026; the County of Santa Clara Health System RFQ for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories due October 7, 2026; and Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management services. Activity spans Arizona, Washington, California, Florida, and Texas. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual goods and services being procured suggests either systematic miscoding in state and local procurement systems or that the code has drifted from its original intent — a signal to verify code assignment before pursuing opportunities listed under this code.