UNSPSC 85563612: Removal of synthetic substitute from nose, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of synthetic substitute from nose, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 09PK4JZ

UNSPSC 85563612 Removal of synthetic substitute from nose, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows no recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal medical procedure scope. The six recent opportunities tagged under this code — ranging from independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical carve-out benefits management, occupational medical surveillance, juvenile detention healthcare services, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — represent healthcare administration and staffing services wholly unrelated to rhinologic surgery or percutaneous endoscopic procedures. State and local procurement systems do not regularly purchase specific surgical procedures as line items; this code appears to reflect a taxonomy misclassification in the underlying opportunity records rather than a meaningful category for business development targeting.

The opportunities that are nonetheless recorded under this code span multiple issuing bodies — city retirement boards and pension authorities (Phoenix), municipal health plan administrators (Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county human resources and benefits consortia (Collier County), and regional health systems (Santa Clara County) — across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Prospective vendors should verify that opportunities actually tagged with this code align with their service lines before pursuing, as the mismatch between code definition and procurement activity suggests systematic miscoding rather than genuine demand for the defined procedure.