UNSPSC 85552802: Restriction of left lacrimal duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left lacrimal duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 08VY3DZ

UNSPSC 85552802 Restriction of left lacrimal duct with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a specific ophthalmic surgical procedure—does not align with the recent opportunities tagged under it. The six most recent state-local contract opportunities solicited independent medical evaluation services for retirement disability determinations (City of Phoenix), surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits for municipal employees (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (Washington State Department of Transportation), emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), pharmacy benefit management services (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories (County of Santa Clara Health System). None of these solicitations concern lacrimal duct restriction procedures or ophthalmic device implantation.

The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by issuing bodies, a data-collection artifact, or limited state and local demand for this specific procedure under organized procurement. State and local jurisdictions do procure a wide range of medical services, examinations, and health professional staffing, as the recent opportunities confirm; however, they do not appear to be sourcing this particular procedure through formal solicitation channels at present. Firms evaluating this code should verify issuing-body intent before pursuing—the code does not currently reflect substantive state and local procurement activity in its stated category.