UNSPSC 85551403: Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left eye, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left eye, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 08W13KZ

UNSPSC 85551403 Revision of nonautologous tissue substitute in left eye, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure for ocular tissue replacement, but the six recent opportunities posted under this code between July and September 2026 reflect healthcare services, medical staffing, and benefits administration rather than tissue-substitute procurement or surgical revision services. The opportunities include independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for transportation workers, emergency and specialty medical care for youth in custody, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories. None of these solicitations involve the purchase or revision of nonautologous tissue substitutes or ophthalmic surgical procedures as the code's name describes.

State and local issuing bodies posting under this code span city retirement boards (City of Phoenix), municipal health plans (City of Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county probation departments (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), county benefits programs (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and county health systems (County of Santa Clara Health System). Geographic activity appears across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The mismatch between the code's clinical scope and the services actually being solicited suggests either a systematic tagging error in the procurement system or that the code has been repurposed in state and local classification schemes to capture broader healthcare administration and staffing work. For firms pursuing opportunities in medical evaluation, employee health benefits, or healthcare staffing, this code shows active recent solicitation; for vendors focused on ophthalmic tissue products or surgical device procurement, the code presents no relevant recent opportunities.