UNSPSC 85543309: Resection of left neck lymphatic, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to resection of left neck lymphatic, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 07T24ZZ

UNSPSC 85543309 Resection of left neck lymphatic, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the actual scope of recent state and local procurement activity tagged under it. The five opportunities in the dataset — covering inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care, peer support for peer workers, and fire department medical direction — span healthcare administration, benefits management, and clinical program oversight rather than surgical procedures. The code's nominal title refers to a specific surgical intervention, yet recent state and local solicitations under this code pursue comprehensive healthcare service contracts, benefit plan management, and clinical support services with no connection to surgical resection or endoscopic procedures.

The issuing bodies represent a geographic and jurisdictional mix of county governments and special-purpose health districts: Muscogee County (Georgia), Collier County (Florida), Monroe County (Florida), San Mateo County (California), and the Santa Monica Fire Department (California). Representative recent opportunities include the Muscogee County Prison inmate medical and pharmacy services RFP (due May 15, 2026) seeking comprehensive healthcare and medication management for approximately 576 offenders, and the Collier County Pharmacy Benefit Management Services RFP (due April 9, 2026) for PBM administration covering approximately 2,400 county employees and 4,800 covered members with historical annual pharmacy spending of approximately $8.7 million. The code shows little substantive recent activity aligned with its stated surgical commodity definition, and the mismatch between the code's scope and the actual procurement work suggests either systematic tagging error or a classification anomaly that may limit its usefulness for vendor targeting in this commodity space.