UNSPSC 85543003: Restriction of aortic lymphatic with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of aortic lymphatic with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 07VD3CZ

UNSPSC 85543003 Restriction of aortic lymphatic with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that bears no meaningful relationship to the state and local procurement activity tagged under it. The recent opportunities posted under this code comprise comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary care platforms, peer support services for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical director services—none of which involve aortic lymphatic restriction procedures or medical devices. The code appears to be a procedural medical taxonomy entry that state and local procurement systems have incorrectly applied to healthcare administration and management contracts. The mismatch suggests either data-entry error in the opportunities themselves or a fundamental misalignment between the UNSPSC coding schema and how these jurisdictions classify healthcare management procurement.

The source shows no recent state and local opportunities genuinely aligned with the code's clinical scope. The activities being solicited—inmate healthcare program management by Muscogee County (Columbus, Georgia), pharmacy benefit administration by Collier County (Florida), virtual care platform services by Monroe County (Florida), peer support program implementation by San Mateo County (California), and medical director services by Santa Monica Fire Department (California)—all involve healthcare administration, service delivery contracting, or program oversight rather than procurement of medical devices or procedural supplies. Given the consistent divergence between the code's nominal scope and the work state and local governments are actually pursuing under it, this code does not represent a viable procurement category for business development purposes in the state and local market.