UNSPSC 85542901: Occlusion of aortic lymphatic, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of aortic lymphatic, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 07LD0ZZ

UNSPSC 85542901 Occlusion of aortic lymphatic, open approach is a Commodity code that, based on recent state and local procurement activity, shows little relevant alignment with the code's nominal clinical scope. The recent opportunities tagged under this code predominantly reflect healthcare services contracting — including comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care platforms, peer support services for mental health workers, and emergency medical services medical direction — rather than the specific surgical or clinical procedure the code name describes. These solicitations represent county and municipal healthcare administration, corrections medical services, and employee health plan management rather than procurement of the aortic lymphatic occlusion procedure itself.

The issuing bodies are primarily county and municipal governments in Florida (Collier County and Monroe County), Georgia (Muscogee County through Columbus Consolidated Government), California (San Mateo County), and the City of Santa Monica. Recent opportunities include the Columbus Consolidated Government's RFP for inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison (due May 15, 2026), Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members with approximately $8.7 million in annual historical spending (due April 9, 2026), and Monroe County's RFP for virtual primary and urgent care services for 2,300 county members (due April 16, 2026). The code appears to be a classification mismatch; the actual procurement activity does not correspond to the procedure code's intended use, suggesting either a data-entry error in the tagging system or that this code is not actively used for genuine state and local medical service contracting in its proper clinical context.