UNSPSC 85542818: Restriction of right axillary lymphatic with extraluminal device, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of right axillary lymphatic with extraluminal device, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 07V50CZ

UNSPSC 85542818 Restriction of right axillary lymphatic with extraluminal device, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the state and local opportunities posted under its tag. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure on the lymphatic system, but the six recent opportunities in the source material solicit occupational medical surveillance, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out networks for employee health plans, pharmacy benefit management, youth detention emergency and specialty medical services, and temporary ancillary clinical staffing — none of which involve lymphatic system procedures or devices. This mislabeling suggests either systematic tagging error or use of the code as a catch-all for general medical services procurement. The mismatch is material: a vendor pursuing work under this code based on its nominal definition would not align with the actual purchasing pattern.

The issuing bodies posting under this code span state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries), counties (Harris County, Collier County, Santa Clara County), and cities (Phoenix, Long Beach), with activity concentrated in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Geographic diversity is broad but the volume is sparse relative to the code's nominal scope. The source contains no evidence of repeat buyers, no set-aside designations specific to this code, and no pattern suggesting this code is the primary vehicle for medical-services procurement at any single jurisdiction. Recent activity reflects either transient misclassification or a code assignment practice that does not serve the code's stated commodity definition.