UNSPSC 85541948: Occlusion of cisterna chyli with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of cisterna chyli with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 07LL4DZ

UNSPSC 85541948 Occlusion of cisterna chyli with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that describes a specific surgical procedure, but recent state and local procurement activity tagged under this code shows little alignment with the code's nominal scope. Instead, the opportunities posted under this code reflect broad healthcare services procurement — medical staffing, occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, and disability evaluation — rather than the specialized vascular or lymphatic procedure the code nominally names.

The issuing bodies span county health systems, county retirement offices, state transportation departments, and county probation authorities across multiple states. Representative recent opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (due October 16, 2026, $750,000 over five years); the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance services across 14 Washington State ferry locations (due October 9, 2026, with a pre-bid conference on August 31, 2026); the County of Santa Clara Health System's qualification-based RFP for temporary health professional staffing in multiple ancillary clinical categories (due October 7, 2026); and Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management services covering approximately 2,400 enrolled employees (due April 9, 2026, with historical annual pharmacy spending of approximately $8.7 million). Activity is concentrated in California, Washington, Arizona, and Florida, with no geographic pattern of repeat buyers or regional clustering. The mismatch between the code's surgical specificity and the actual healthcare administration and staffing services being solicited suggests this code may be mistagged in state and local procurement systems or that the tagging reflects upstream health plan coding rather than procurement intent.