UNSPSC 85534053: Bypass inferior vena cava to inferior mesenteric vein with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass inferior vena cava to inferior mesenteric vein with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06104K6

UNSPSC 85534053 Bypass inferior vena cava to inferior mesenteric vein with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code with no meaningful recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its clinical procedure scope. The source contains six recent state and local opportunities posted between July and September 2026, none of which solicit the vascular bypass procedure named in the code; instead, the opportunities span occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Ferries), disability medical evaluations (City of Phoenix), surgical benefit carve-out programs (City of Long Beach), emergency and specialty care for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), and temporary ancillary health professional staffing (Santa Clara County Health System).

The disconnect between the code and the opportunities in the source suggests either a systematic misclassification within the state and local procurement system or minimal demand for this specific surgical procedure through public-sector procurement channels. State and local governments typically purchase this procedure indirectly through health plan coverage, capitated provider networks, or institutional service agreements rather than as a standalone line-item procurement. No issuing body has posted an RFP, RFQ, IFB, or ITB specifically requesting bypass-graft implants or related clinical services under this code in the recent-opportunities block, and no geographic concentration or repeat-buyer pattern emerges from the mismatch between code and solicitation content. Business development professionals evaluating this code should treat it as inactive for direct state and local contracting purposes and investigate whether opportunities are tagged upstream (at the health benefit or managed care level) or whether vendor engagement occurs through different procurement channels entirely.