UNSPSC 85533715: Insertion of intraluminal device into right renal vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of intraluminal device into right renal vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06H94DZ

UNSPSC 85533715 Insertion of intraluminal device into right renal vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not match the work actually being solicited in recent state and local procurement activity. The code's medical-procedural scope — a specific interventional vascular technique — bears no relation to the opportunities tagged under it, which cover occupational medical surveillance, pension-disability medical evaluations, surgical-benefits carve-out administration, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing placement, and emergency medical services for youth in detention. The code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its nominal description.

Recent opportunities under this code span state departments, county governments, and municipalities purchasing employee health benefits, occupational medicine programs, and ancillary clinical staffing. The Washington State Department of Transportation (Washington State Ferries) issued an RFP for occupational medical surveillance across 14 ferry locations, due October 9, 2026. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office requested proposals for independent medical evaluation services supporting disability pension determinations, due October 16, 2026 at $750,000 over five years. The City of Long Beach solicited surgical benefit carve-out management for its Anthem PPO plan, due October 7, 2026. Geographic activity concentrates in Washington, Arizona, California, and Florida, with broader representation in state health systems and county benefits administration. The mismatch between code taxonomy and actual procurement suggests either tagging error or a broader health-services classification problem requiring verification before pursuit.