UNSPSC 85533546: Replacement of colic vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of colic vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06R747Z

UNSPSC 85533546, Replacement of colic vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach, is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the state and local opportunities recently posted under this taxonomy do not align with the code's medical procedure scope. Instead, the opportunities reflect broader healthcare administration, occupational medicine, pharmacy benefit management, and clinical staffing services—functional areas that fall outside the narrow surgical intervention the code names.

The source records six recent state and local solicitations tagged under this code, yet none directly address colic vein replacement or related surgical procedures. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office solicited independent medical evaluation services for disability determinations; the City of Long Beach sought a surgical benefit carve-out program managing centers of excellence for knee, hip, orthopedic, shoulder, spine, heart, weight loss, and oncology procedures; the Washington State Department of Transportation requested occupational medical surveillance for ferries personnel; Harris County Juvenile Probation Department issued an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth; Collier County solicited pharmacy benefit management; and Santa Clara Health System established a temporary staffing pool for ancillary clinical roles excluding nursing and physician services. This divergence between the code's nominal scope and the actual work being bought suggests either a taxonomy mismatch in how opportunities were tagged or that the code itself sees minimal procurement activity in the state and local space. Vendors evaluating activity under this code should verify the actual scope of opportunities of interest before pursuing, as the UNSPSC designation may not reflect the work descriptions in individual RFPs or RFQs.