UNSPSC 85533408: Restriction of left external iliac vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left external iliac vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06VG4DZ

UNSPSC 85533408 Restriction of left external iliac vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific vascular surgical procedure, but the recent opportunities posted under this code do not reflect procurement of that procedure or related medical devices. Instead, the solicitations tagged to this code span occupational medical surveillance services, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical Center of Excellence networks, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for youth in custody—none of which align with the code's named scope. The mismatch suggests either data-tagging error in the source system or use of the code as a catch-all for health services procurement without regard to specificity.

The small volume of opportunities and their lack of connection to the code's stated definition limit practical utility for vendors targeting vascular intervention supplies or services. State and local buyers issuing under this code include county health systems, county juvenile probation, city retirement boards, and state transportation departments, but their actual procurement needs—occupational health programs, medical examinations for pension determinations, and health plan benefit management—fall well outside vascular surgical device and procedure scope. Geographic activity spans Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington, but the dispersion across unrelated service lines reflects fragmentation rather than a coherent procurement category. The code does not display focused, recurring demand that would support sustained business development in the stated specialty.